Understanding by Design (UbD)

OVERVIEW

​

Understanding by Design (UbD) is an educational planning approach that emphasizes designing course curriculums and instructional units by focusing on the desired results (learning outcomes) rather than the traditional planning method around classroom activities and lessons. It was developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe and is characterized by three stages:

​

1. Identify Desired Results: In this first stage, educators define what they want their students to understand and be able to do at the end of the unit. This involves setting clear goals, understanding standards, and determining the essential questions to guide the learning process. The key is to identify the "big ideas" that give meaning and importance to the content.

2. Determine Acceptable Evidence: This stage revolves around evidence of student learning. Educators decide how they will know whether students have achieved the desired learning outcomes. This involves planning assessments to measure understanding, skills, and knowledge. These assessments can be varied, including tests, projects, presentations, and other forms of student work.

3. Plan Learning Experiences and Instruction: In the final stage, educators plan the learning experiences and instructional strategies that will lead to achieving the desired results. This involves organizing activities, lessons, and assignments to guide students' learning journey. The focus here is on creating opportunities for students to explore the content, develop skills, and construct their understanding.

​

By working backward from the goals (results) to the means (learning activities), UbD helps ensure that the educational process is aligned with the desired outcomes, making learning more effective and meaningful.

 

 

IMPLICATIONS FOR INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN

​

The Understanding by Design (UbD) model significantly impacts instructional design, offering a structured and efficient framework that fundamentally shifts the focus from traditional teaching methods to outcome-centered education. The primary implication of UbD is the emphasis on backward design, which requires educators to start with the end in mind - the desired learning outcomes - and then plan the curriculum, instructional methods, and assessments accordingly. This approach ensures that all aspects of instruction are aligned with the objectives, leading to more purposeful and coherent education.

​

Another critical aspect of UbD is its focus on developing deep understanding and transferable skills rather than merely rote memorization or surface learning. By identifying 'big ideas' and essential questions, UbD encourages educators to design inquiry-based learning experiences and encourage critical thinking, allowing students to make connections and apply their knowledge in varied contexts. This fosters a deeper understanding and long-term retention of material.

​

Furthermore, UbD's emphasis on evidence-based assessment aligns evaluation with learning objectives. This approach assesses whether students have learned the content and how they can apply their knowledge and skills in different situations. It encourages a variety of assessment methods, moving beyond traditional tests to include projects, presentations, and other forms of performance-based evaluations. 

​

​

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS IN HIGHER EDUCATION

​

While UbD offers a structured and outcome-focused approach beneficial for creating meaningful and engaging courses in higher education, it also demands considerable time and expertise from educators, with a potential risk of over-focusing on end goals at the expense of the learning process. 

​

Strengths:

• Clear Focus on Desired Outcomes: UbD’s backward design approach ensures that all instructional elements are aligned with the end goals. This clarity in objectives helps create a coherent course focused on developing the student's understanding and skills in line with the course outcomes. It’s particularly beneficial in higher education where courses often aim to create complex, higher-order thinking skills.

•  Enhanced Student Engagement and Understanding: By starting with the "big ideas" and essential questions, UbD encourages the development of deep, conceptual understanding rather than just memorizing facts. This approach fosters critical thinking and application skills, which are crucial in higher education. It also increases student engagement as the material becomes more relevant and thought-provoking.

• Flexible and Diverse Assessment Strategies: UbD emphasizes varied and authentic assessment methods more reflective of real-world applications. This variety can cater to different learning styles and provides a more comprehensive evaluation of student learning, moving beyond traditional testing methods to include projects, presentations, and other assessment forms.

 

Limitations:

• Time-Consuming Planning Process: The backward design process can be more time-intensive than traditional course planning methods. Identifying end goals, aligning content and assessments, and ensuring coherence throughout require substantial upfront investment in planning, which can be challenging with limited preparation time.

• Potential Overemphasis on End Goals: While focusing on the end goals is beneficial, there's a risk of overlooking the importance of the learning journey. The process of exploration, discovery, and gradual understanding might need to be more emphasized, which can be crucial in complex, higher-order subjects typical in college courses.

• Requires High Educator Expertise: Successfully implementing UbD demands a deep understanding of the subject matter and instructional design principles. Educators need to be adept at defining clear objectives and creating engaging and meaningful learning experiences and assessments. This can be a significant hurdle, especially for newer educators with less experience in curriculum design.