ADDIE

OVERVIEW

The ADDIE model was created by Florida State University for military use in the 1970s. It was designed to offer a systematic approach to instructional design, ensuring the creation of effective, high-quality learning experiences that provided flexibility and adaptability to cater to various learning contexts and needs.
 
ADDIE stands for Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation.

Analysis

This phase involves identifying and understanding the instructional goal or learning gap.  Components of the analysis phase include: 

• Needs Assessment -  Data is collected (via surveys, interviews, focus groups, observation) to identify the gap between what learners know and what they need to know. 

• Audience Analysis - Identifying factors including demographics, prior knowledge, learning preferences, and motivation. 

• Contextual Analysis - Considering factors such as learning environment, available resources, or time constraints that will impact the learning.

• Constraints & Limitations - This analysis may include budgetary, technical, or physical limitations of the course. 

• Project Scope- Identifying what will and won't be covered in the learning materials. 

 
Design

Creating a detailed outline of the entire learning experience, including learning objectives, content and structure, media and resources, and UI design.  A key part of the design phase is the development of assessments and evaluations, as well as creating prototypes and/or storyboards. 
 
Development

Creating the actual learning materials based on the plan developed in the design phase -  this requires the collaboration of all contributors.  

Implementation

This phase is the delivery of the course to the audience, including assessments, feedback, progress tracking, and final evaluation of learning. 

Evaluation

Assessing the effectiveness of the instruction and planning for future iterations. Instruction designers will perform formative and summative assessments, review data, engage stakeholders, and make modifications for future iterations of the course. 

 
IMPLICATIONS OF ADDIE FOR INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN

Embracing the ADDIE model can profoundly impact the work of instructional designs. At its core, it offers a comprehensive, step-by-step process that ensures all critical elements of course design, from understanding student needs to post-delivery evaluations, are addressed. This approach enhances the quality of courses, making them more engaging and effective. 

The ADDIE model also promotes efficiency in course creation by offering a clear roadmap, reducing oversights, and ensuring a smoother design process. While ADDIE provides structure, it's also inherently flexible. This adaptability is invaluable as the academic landscape evolves, requiring continuous revisions and improvements. One of the standout features of ADDIE is its emphasis on informed decision-making. The in-depth analysis phase prioritizes understanding your learners, informing every decision, and ensuring courses are thoughtfully tailored. Furthermore, with the model's built-in evaluation phase, there's a consistent emphasis on feedback and continuous improvement, fostering a much-needed design culture.  

 
STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Strengths 

• Systematic Approach: One of the primary advantages of ADDIE is its systematic approach to instructional design. It provides a clear structure for creating instructional materials, starting with needs analysis and ending with evaluation. This structured process ensures that designers consider all essential elements for effective learning experiences.

• Flexibility: ADDIE is flexible and adaptable. Designers can customize each phase to suit the unique needs of the learners, subject matter, and instructional context. This adaptability is especially valuable when designing a wide range of courses or training programs.

• Iterative Nature: ADDIE's iterative nature allows for continuous improvement. Designers can revisit and revise each phase based on feedback and evaluation results, ensuring the instructional materials remain relevant and effective.

• Effective Evaluation: The Evaluation phase of ADDIE provides a structured way to assess the effectiveness of instructional materials and make data-driven improvements. This data-driven approach helps organizations refine their training programs over time.

 
Limitations

• Time-Consuming: The ADDIE model can be time-consuming, especially in large-scale educational settings. Conducting thorough analyses, developing comprehensive designs, and evaluating outcomes can be resource-intensive.

• Rigidity: While flexibility is a benefit, the structured nature of ADDIE may also be seen as a limitation. Some argue it can be overly prescriptive and may not accommodate rapidly changing educational or training needs.

• Lack of Emphasis on Technology: ADDIE does not explicitly address integrating technology into instructional design. In today's digital learning environment, instructional designers often need to consider technology's role in learning experiences, which may require additional frameworks and models.

• Potential for Incomplete Analysis: The success of an instructional design project heavily relies on the accuracy of the initial analysis in the Analysis phase. Incomplete or inaccurate analyses can lead to poorly designed learning materials.

• Resource-Intensive Evaluation: The Evaluation phase, while essential, can be resource-intensive, requiring data collection, analysis, and potential revisions. Smaller organizations or those with limited resources may find it challenging to conduct comprehensive evaluations.

​